![em client 7 zippyshare em client 7 zippyshare](https://www.emclient.com/sitecontrol/en/images/screenshots/emc_img_scr_cloudstorage_expiration.jpg)
The same rationale probably applies to the widespread practice of quoting from favorable reviews in advertisements for books, films, and plays." Trap House's Official YouTube Channel: IFPI IFPI's Linkedin Page: IFPI’s official Twitter page: IFPI’s official website link: Why? The ad significantly increased the number of people exposed to the Consumers Reports' evaluations and thereby disseminated helpful consumer information. For example, in its advertising a vacuum cleaner manufacturer was permitted to quote from a Consumer Reports article comparing vacuum cleaners. A use that benefits the public can qualify as a fair use, even if it makes money for the user. A commercial motive doesn't always disqualify someone from claiming a fair use. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. "Under the "fair use" rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. I'm a music promoter so I me promoting Kendrick Lamar's music falls under "fair use." In some situations, you may make limited use of another's copyrighted work without asking permission or infringing on the original copyright. IFPI (the company doing the flagging) have no connection at all to Kendrick Lamar.
![em client 7 zippyshare em client 7 zippyshare](https://thesoftware.shop/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/iMobie-AnyTrans-for-Android-Review-free-download-coupon-788x788.png)
Today, I received an e-mail from YouTube's Support Team telling me that they had yanked one of my videos because of a copyright claim from IFPI And I would appreciate it if would IFPI would retract their copyright claim because IFPI are a third-party source who are not owners of the questionable content.